Talk:Electric Sluice: Difference between revisions

>McClaw
>McClaw
Line 1: Line 1:
==Trial Results==
==Trial Results==
I've been doing some sluicing testing and have achieved the following overall results:
I've been doing some sluicing testing and have achieved the following overall results:
:With 2,600 gravel processed into ores: 658 copper (~25%), 632 tin (~25%), 502 coal (~19%), 521 iron (~20%), 183 gold (~7%), 50 titanium (~2%), 54 platinum (~2%). Last updated: --[[User:McClaw|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw|talk]]) 19:58, 3 November 2015 (MST)
:With 3,000 gravel processed into ores: 747 copper (~25%), 725 tin (~24%), 589 coal (~20%), 610 iron (~20%), 211 gold (~7%), 55 titanium (~2%), 63 platinum (~2%). Last updated: --[[User:McClaw|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw|talk]]) 10:57, 17 November 2015 (MST)


==Value==
==Value==
Consider the in-game price difference between purchasing 100 stone through a trade portal, crushing them to gravel, and processing them into ores with buying the ores directly. Based on statistically average outcomes and current prices, you'd spend over 6,000 times as much (mostly on the gold, platinum, and titanium in ascending order). But even pricing just one of the common ores, it would cost over three times as much (for 25 tin) and you get the other ores as a bonus. --[[User:McClaw|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw|talk]]) 19:58, 3 November 2015 (MST)
Consider the in-game price difference between purchasing 100 stone through a trade portal, crushing them to gravel, and processing them into ores with buying the ores directly. Based on statistically average outcomes and current prices, you'd spend over 6,000 times as much (mostly on the gold, platinum, and titanium in ascending order). But even pricing just one of the common ores, it would cost over three times as much (for 25 tin) and you get the other ores as a bonus. --[[User:McClaw|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw|talk]]) 19:58, 3 November 2015 (MST)
Anonymous user