Talk:Tool Bench: Difference between revisions
From The Blockheads Wiki
>Cdrras (Created page with "For each level, do you think it would be better to list the items like they are or should we change it over to a table format. Something like we did on the tools page (See Bel...") |
>Abcboy mNo edit summary |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For each level, do you think it would be better to list the items like they are or should we change it over to a table format. Something like we did on the tools page (See Below for example). I can make an identical template but instead of "Location" we can put the slogan. I think it would look sharper. Thoughts? [[User:Cdrras|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras|talk]]) 08:04, 25 February 2013 (MST) | For each level, do you think it would be better to list the items like they are or should we change it over to a table format. Something like we did on the tools page (See Below for example). I can make an identical template but instead of "Location" we can put the slogan. I think it would look sharper. Thoughts? [[User:Cdrras|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras|talk]]) 08:04, 25 February 2013 (MST) | ||
{{ | <!--{{Craft | ||
| | | Output = Flint Spade | ||
| | | Bench = Lvl. 1 Tool Bench | ||
| Name1 = Stick | | Name1 = Stick | ||
| Name2 = Flint | | Name2 = Flint | ||
| Qty1 = 1 | | Qty1 = 1 | ||
| Qty2 = 3 | | Qty2 = 3 | ||
}} | | QtyOutput = 1 | ||
}}--> | |||
''Table hidden'' | |||
:Nevermind. Although it might look a little better, it would make the page pretty long. Not to mention, we would have to change all the other crafting surface pages. That is more work than we need. I say we keep it how it is for now and maybe at a later time, we may think about changing it around. [[User:Cdrras|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras|talk]]) 08:08, 25 February 2013 (MST) | |||
::Actually, what about this idea? Now bear with me, the following items aren't from the Tool Bench, but we could do this format for all of the crafting surfaces and their items for each of the levels. If it is a weapon/tool we'll just link to the generic page (ie.<nowiki>[[Pickaxe|Flint Pickaxe]]</nowiki>). If is an actual item, it will link to its page. It sort of just gives a basic rundown of everything in a clean format. Thoughts? [[User:Cdrras|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras|talk]]) 09:06, 25 February 2013 (MST) | |||
{| class="wikitable" border="1" align="center" | |||
! Icon | |||
! Name | |||
! Slogan | |||
! Item 1 | |||
! Item 2 | |||
! Item 3 | |||
|- | |||
| height="27px" | [[File:Amethyst Chandelier Icon.png|25px]]|| [[Chandelier|Amethyst Chandelier]]||''Purple Haze''|| 1 x [[File:Amethyst Icon.png|25px]]|| 10 x [[File:Glass Icon.png|25px]]|| | |||
|- | |||
| height="27px" | [[File:Sapphire Chandelier Icon.png|25px]]|| [[Chandelier|Sapphire Chandelier]]||''A bright blue glow''|| 1 x [[File:Sapphire Icon.png|25px]]|| 10 x [[File:Glass Icon.png|25px]]|| | |||
|- | |||
| height="27px" | [[File:Emerald Chandelier Icon.png|25px]]|| [[Chandelier|Emerald Chandelier]]||''For your green room''|| 1 x [[File:Emerald Icon.png|25px]]|| 10 x [[File:Glass Icon.png|25px]]|| | |||
|- | |||
| height="27px" | [[File:Ruby Chandelier Icon.png|25px]]|| [[Chandelier|Ruby Chandelier]]||''Moody extravagence''|| 1 x [[File:Ruby Icon.png|25px]]|| 10 x [[File:Glass Icon.png|25px]]|| | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
| height="27px" | [[File:Diamond Chandelier Icon.png|25px]]|| [[Chandelier|Diamond Chandelier]]||''The pinnacle of light''|| 1 x [[File:Diamond Icon.png|25px]]|| 10 x [[File:Glass Icon.png|25px]]|| | |||
|} | |||
:::I was mostly trying to get the information on to the page so everyone could work on the formatting. That second table looks pretty good and reasonably compact. Tool Bench will be an issue mostly because of the number of options it has. It would almost have to be split into separate pages by level to shorten it. --[[User:McClaw|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw|talk]]) 09:44, 25 February 2013 (MST) | |||
::::I figured that is what you were doing. It is much better to get the information on here and then worry about formatting. For the Tool Bench, I had planned to break it up. There will be a table for each level with those just the items that got added. [[User:Cdrras|Cdrras]] ([[User talk:Cdrras|talk]]) 10:38, 25 February 2013 (MST) |
Latest revision as of 00:45, 1 December 2013
For each level, do you think it would be better to list the items like they are or should we change it over to a table format. Something like we did on the tools page (See Below for example). I can make an identical template but instead of "Location" we can put the slogan. I think it would look sharper. Thoughts? Cdrras (talk) 08:04, 25 February 2013 (MST) Table hidden
- Nevermind. Although it might look a little better, it would make the page pretty long. Not to mention, we would have to change all the other crafting surface pages. That is more work than we need. I say we keep it how it is for now and maybe at a later time, we may think about changing it around. Cdrras (talk) 08:08, 25 February 2013 (MST)
- Actually, what about this idea? Now bear with me, the following items aren't from the Tool Bench, but we could do this format for all of the crafting surfaces and their items for each of the levels. If it is a weapon/tool we'll just link to the generic page (ie.[[Pickaxe|Flint Pickaxe]]). If is an actual item, it will link to its page. It sort of just gives a basic rundown of everything in a clean format. Thoughts? Cdrras (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2013 (MST)
Icon | Name | Slogan | Item 1 | Item 2 | Item 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amethyst Chandelier | Purple Haze | 1 x | 10 x | ||
Sapphire Chandelier | A bright blue glow | 1 x | 10 x | ||
Emerald Chandelier | For your green room | 1 x | 10 x | ||
Ruby Chandelier | Moody extravagence | 1 x | 10 x | ||
Diamond Chandelier | The pinnacle of light | 1 x | 10 x |
- I was mostly trying to get the information on to the page so everyone could work on the formatting. That second table looks pretty good and reasonably compact. Tool Bench will be an issue mostly because of the number of options it has. It would almost have to be split into separate pages by level to shorten it. --McClaw (talk) 09:44, 25 February 2013 (MST)