User talk:McClaw: Difference between revisions

m
>McClaw
>Abcboy
Line 79: Line 79:


:I have no objections to either way of doing it, so long as we keep it consistent. I will observe, though, that the "Items" page is mostly a list of items and the "Item" category is applied to individual item pages. --[[User:McClaw|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw|talk]]) 08:00, 29 August 2014 (MDT)
:I have no objections to either way of doing it, so long as we keep it consistent. I will observe, though, that the "Items" page is mostly a list of items and the "Item" category is applied to individual item pages. --[[User:McClaw|McClaw]] ([[User talk:McClaw|talk]]) 08:00, 29 August 2014 (MDT)
::Most things are already in the singular, such as all the items. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(plurals) (What Wikipedia does)] I prefer categories to in the plural, because the category of items contains items. Some things shouldn't be changed, like Category:Rail, a category of rail-related things. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categorization#Category_tree_organization Or as Wikipedia calls it, topic and set categories.]
::Also, what would you think of a template that makes it easier to link to Wikipedia, something like <code><nowiki>{{wp|Apple}}</nowiki></code>? It could be used in pages so we don't have to keep typing a link manually each time. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 10:18, 29 August 2014 (MDT)
Anonymous user