Anonymous user
Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
→Even More Users
>Craig.Davison (→Even More Users: new section) |
>Abcboy |
||
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
I was thinking, considering the massive 1.4 update which is rumoured to have lots new benches and items. We probably need more users to help. I think I might, when the update comes out, post a thread on the forums saying that we need help on the blockheads wiki. New users would be great! We hardly have any and we need people to make the stub category smaller and I'm guessing a lot more in-detail pages will have to be created. Is this a good idea?--[[User:Craig.Davison|Craig.Davison]] ([[User talk:Craig.Davison|talk]]) 02:45, 7 September 2013 (MDT) | I was thinking, considering the massive 1.4 update which is rumoured to have lots new benches and items. We probably need more users to help. I think I might, when the update comes out, post a thread on the forums saying that we need help on the blockheads wiki. New users would be great! We hardly have any and we need people to make the stub category smaller and I'm guessing a lot more in-detail pages will have to be created. Is this a good idea?--[[User:Craig.Davison|Craig.Davison]] ([[User talk:Craig.Davison|talk]]) 02:45, 7 September 2013 (MDT) | ||
:More pages! Good right? My problem is quality, not quantity. If we just get a bunch of people who create pages that luk liek dis, the wiki's quality will go down. Also, vandalism. (Wiki griefers) Our only admin is here once every month, and our person who has the authority to get more admins is never on. So vandals can just destroy everything, with our only defence being to revert it. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 14:35, 7 September 2013 (MDT) | |||